今天在写代码时突然想起测试经常用Microsoft.VisualBasic.Information.IsNumeric判断 url参数是否为数字时的这个方法的效率
因为数字是字符串是直接使用的,所以不需要转型,也就没有用tryparse
结果一测试吓一跳,这个方法的效率是如此的低,再测试了下tryparse还不错,正则的也比较差,
没什么技术含量,看结果吧:
先拓展下字符串:
- public static class Common
- {
- //isDigit
- public static bool isNumberic1(this string _string)
- {
- if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(_string))
- return false;
- foreach (char c in _string)
- {
- if (!char.IsDigit(c))
- return false;
- }
- return true;
- }
- //vb isnumberic
- public static bool isNumberic2(this string _string)
- {
- return !string.IsNullOrEmpty(_string) && Microsoft.VisualBasic.Information.IsNumeric(_string);
- }
- //try parese
- public static bool isNumberic3(this string _string)
- {
- if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(_string))
- return false;
- int i = 0;
- return int.TryParse(_string, out i);
- }
- //try catch
- public static bool isNumberic4(this string _string)
- {
- if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(_string))
- return false;
- int i = 0;
- try { int.Parse(_string); }
- catch { return false; }
- return true;
- }
- //regex
- public static bool isNumberic5(this string _string)
- {
- return !string.IsNullOrEmpty(_string) && Regex.IsMatch(_string, "^\\d+contentquot;);
- }
- }
测试的代码:
- class Program
- {
- static void Main(string args)
- {
- Test("1234");
- Test("1234a");
- Test("a1234");
- Test("");
- Test(null);
- }
- static void Test(string str)
- {
- bool res1 = false, res2 = false, res3 = false, res4 = false, res5 = false;
- Stopwatch wat = new Stopwatch();
- for (int i = 1; i < 100000; i++)
- {
- res1 = str.isNumberic1();
- }
- wat.Stop();
- Console.WriteLine("isDigit {0}:{1},{2}", str, wat.ElapsedMilliseconds, res1);
- wat.Reset();
- wat.Start();
- for (int i = 1; i < 100000; i++)
- {
- res2= str.isNumberic2();
- }
- wat.Stop();
- Console.WriteLine("isNumberic {0}:{1},{2}", str, wat.ElapsedMilliseconds, res2);
- wat.Reset();
- wat.Start();
- for (int i = 1; i < 100000; i++)
- {
- res3 = str.isNumberic3();
- }
- wat.Stop();
- Console.WriteLine("try parse {0}:{1},{2}", str, wat.ElapsedMilliseconds, res3);
- wat.Reset();
- wat.Start();
- for (int i = 1; i < 100000; i++)
- {
- res4 = str.isNumberic4();
- }
- wat.Stop();
- Console.WriteLine("try catch {0}:{1},{2}", str, wat.ElapsedMilliseconds, res4);
- wat.Reset();
- wat.Start();
- for (int i = 1; i < 100000; i++)
- {
- res5 = str.isNumberic5();
- }
- wat.Stop();
- Console.WriteLine("regex {0}:{1},{2}", str, wat.ElapsedMilliseconds, res5);
- Console.WriteLine();
- }
- }
下面是我本机的测试结果
- isDigit 1234:0,True
- isNumberic 1234:173,True
- try parse 1234:21,True
- try catch 1234:23,True
- regex 1234:138,True
- isDigit 1234a:0,False
- isNumberic 1234a:204,False
- try parse 1234a:20,False
- try catch 1234a:5309,False
- regex 1234a:151,False
- isDigit a1234:0,False
- isNumberic a1234:191,False
- try parse a1234:16,False
- try catch a1234:5229,False
- regex a1234:109,False
- isDigit :0,False
- isNumberic :0,False
- try parse :0,False
- try catch :1,False
- regex :0,False
- isDigit :0,False
- isNumberic :1,False
- try parse :0,False
- try catch :1,False
- regex :0,False
结果:循环判断是否是数字字符效率是最高的
而vbscript的方法效率比较低了
顺便测试了下vbscript里的left和right方法效率也一样的低,还不及substring的十分之一
所以vbscript里虽然有几个方法从名字看来比较好用,实际却比较杯具。