中美家庭教育与个人能力培养
【网学提醒】：本文主要为网上学习者提供中美家庭教育与个人能力培养，希望对需要中美家庭教育与个人能力培养网友有所帮助，学习一下吧!
资料包括： 论文(20页5810字)
说明：
摘 要：当今，国际竞争日益激烈，而这种竞争归根到底是人的素质的竞争，是人才培养的竞争。从某种情况下，人才的竞争是父母育儿能力的竞争。因此，家庭教育的理念和方法直接影响了孩子个人能力的培养。本文通过对中美两国家庭教育在教育目的、教育方法、教育结果方面的比较，分析形成两国家庭教育差异的原因，进而找出对中国家庭教育改革的启示，美国家庭教育的一些实践，能为中国提供借鉴。从而使中国孩子变得能够独立生存，适应各种环境，具有独立解决问题的能力。
关键词：家庭教育；能力培养；中国；美国
Abstract
Nowadays, the personal quality of talents is critical amid the fierce international competition environment. To some extent, the competition of talents is the competition of the ability that parents train children. So the ideas and methodology of family education will affect training effectiveness. This essay attempts to compare family education between China and America in terms of educational purpose, educational result and educational method, analyze the reasons for forming educational differences between the two countries, and then propose the enlightenment for Chinese family education reform. Some family educational practices in USA can provide reference for Chinese family educational reform which intends to bring up more independent, adaptive, innovative, self-initiative Chinese children in today’s complex society.
Key Words
Family education; ability training; China; America
Introduction
The Chinese traditional education emphasizes on the instruction of knowledge, while America education strengthens the training of students’ ability, and both need to exchange education level and supplementary. Through access to the essay, it is well known: there are different education methods and level between China and America
As for present society, Chinese parents lack scientific experience in educating offspring. They insist on out-of-date, backward and wrong educational idea. The phenomenon that pays attention to teaching without right way is common. It is urgent to solve the problem in family educational practice. In China, parents care about doing the most of the things for their child. It includes the intrinsic reason: the burden of education system in China. It is ridiculous that this kind of college depends on the students’ score and the students inevitably pursuit the score. The values between the two countries are different, so are living styles and social systems. As for concept, historical background, culture and education, there are lots of quite differences. The Chinese focus on studying scores and the master skills. No matter what they learn, they try to do the best; no matter what they do, they strive for perfection. In brief, Chinese try to make children feel the social being, create the environment to make children learn to grow up. Chinese children are passive, malleable, and growing up under the guidance of their parents.
In comparison with the vision that Chinese students and parents are focusing on the children entering higher schools step by step, American lay emphasis on training students’ abilities. They pay attention to the children''s sense of social participation. There are many chances for children to choose freely. The teacher still does his utmost to encourage children to play freely, to be creative, and in order to train children''s imaginations and creativities. Americans train the child for the real world. American children are initiative and rich in creating. The self-actualization is the children''s own nature and development; the adult only needs to offer the favorable condition. Certainly, the American education also has the malpractice. It is too free and too interesting in individual development. The worst is the lack of controlling the morality.
目录：
Abstract…………………..………………………………………………..………I
Key Words……………………………………………………………………………I
摘要……………………………………….…………………………………..……II
关键词………………………………………………………………………………II
Introduction…………………………………………………………………….……1
I. The Comparsion of Two Countries Family Education…………….…..…………2
A. The Comparison of Education Purpose ….…………………………………2
B. The Comparison of Education Method ….…………………………………..3 C. The Comparison of Education Result….………………………………..……4
II. Analyzing Reasons for Different Family Education Modal between China and
America……………………………………………………………………………5
A. The Difference of the Historical Background …………………….…..………5
B. The Difference of the Economic Shape ….…………………………………..5
C. The Difference of Social Conditions ……………………………….…………6
D. The Difference of Cultural Traditions …………………………….…………7
III. Measures to Improve Individual Ability ……………………….……………9
A. Changing Suitable Educational Concept…………….…………………….9
B. Understanding Definite Educational Purpose……..………………..……10
C. Adopting Suitable Educational Ways ……..………………..…………11
Conclusion……………………………………………………………….……….…..13
Acknowledgements…………………………………………….………………..…..14
Bibliography……………………………………………………………….……….15
参考文献：
Elizabeth. Valley Selei. American parents how to "control" their children.Beijing: International Culture press,2004.
George Watson.Writing a Thesis : a Guide to Long Essays and Dissertations.Chengdu :Sichuan University press,2003.
Mlke.Silitum.Flea Readers. Beijing :Foreign language press,2000.
P.G.Beidler.Writing Matters. Chengdu :Sichuan University press,2003.
Wang Qiang.A Cause in English Language Teaching. Senior education press,2000.
Thomas. Likena. American family education. Haikou: Hainan press,2005.
陈建翔.他们影响了全世界家庭 [M]. 北京 ：北京出版社 ， 2005.
陈新峰.培养优秀孩子的8个锦囊[M]. 北京：石油工业出版社，2005.
房阳洋，关阿津，汤海清.观念决定成长[M]. 北京：团结出版社，2005.
高芸香.我的家庭课堂[M]. 北京：中国人民大学出版社，2004.
胡东芳.教育新思维[M]. 桂林：广西师范大学出版社， 2003.
胡东芳.让教育焕发生命的价值[M]. 桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2003.
贾黛羽.世界最伟大的教育法规[M].上海：文汇出版社，2003.
李安.美式教育成功之密[M]. 呼和浩特：内蒙古人民出版社， 2001.
[15]刘平.打包中国教育[M]. 北京：时事出版社，2005.
[16]吴垒.走出家庭教育的误区[M]. 成都：四川科学技术出版社，2003.
[17]扬晓升.拷问中国教育[M]. 上海：文汇出版社，2005.
[18]佚名. 国外的父母如何教孩子自立,美国家庭教育见闻,中西方教育差异之家庭教育[J].
[19]佚名. 家庭教育中的问题及对策[J].
作者点评：
中美家庭教育与个人能力培养
Everyone knows that family is the first teacher to train the individual ability, in a sense, talents'' competition is a competition of parents educating children ability. So, the countries all over the world pay more attention to family education in training talents'' education project in new century. Now the family education has already caused the concern from various circles of society in China, there are still some mistaken ideas remained in the education of many Chinese families. It even becomes a kind of persistent ailment, and influences the forming of a generation with good quality. Therefore, it is necessary to draw lessons from the valuable practices in the family education of other countries. It will have good inspiration and alarm function in stepping the mistaken idea educated in China.
The purpose of American family education is fostering independent children who can adapt to each environment. The purpose of Chinese is training children to be talent. About education concept, American parents think children are independent, they have their willing and personality, do not belong to their parents. Parents or teachers have no right to dominate or restrict children’s behavior. Chinese parents think children are one part of their lives; they should protect children, offer good living situation and plan their futures. On education method, American parents adopt democracy attitude. They give children power to do anything. Chinese parents interfere and worry excessively; they control children’s lives. This essay attempts to compare family education differences between China and the United States, and find advantages of American family education which can offer reference for Chinese. It can change Chinese children into independent ones who can adapt to each environment and have the ability to solve complex problem by themselves.
资料包括： 论文(20页5810字)
说明：
摘 要：当今，国际竞争日益激烈，而这种竞争归根到底是人的素质的竞争，是人才培养的竞争。从某种情况下，人才的竞争是父母育儿能力的竞争。因此，家庭教育的理念和方法直接影响了孩子个人能力的培养。本文通过对中美两国家庭教育在教育目的、教育方法、教育结果方面的比较，分析形成两国家庭教育差异的原因，进而找出对中国家庭教育改革的启示，美国家庭教育的一些实践，能为中国提供借鉴。从而使中国孩子变得能够独立生存，适应各种环境，具有独立解决问题的能力。
关键词：家庭教育；能力培养；中国；美国
Abstract
Nowadays, the personal quality of talents is critical amid the fierce international competition environment. To some extent, the competition of talents is the competition of the ability that parents train children. So the ideas and methodology of family education will affect training effectiveness. This essay attempts to compare family education between China and America in terms of educational purpose, educational result and educational method, analyze the reasons for forming educational differences between the two countries, and then propose the enlightenment for Chinese family education reform. Some family educational practices in USA can provide reference for Chinese family educational reform which intends to bring up more independent, adaptive, innovative, self-initiative Chinese children in today’s complex society.
Key Words
Family education; ability training; China; America
Introduction
The Chinese traditional education emphasizes on the instruction of knowledge, while America education strengthens the training of students’ ability, and both need to exchange education level and supplementary. Through access to the essay, it is well known: there are different education methods and level between China and America
As for present society, Chinese parents lack scientific experience in educating offspring. They insist on out-of-date, backward and wrong educational idea. The phenomenon that pays attention to teaching without right way is common. It is urgent to solve the problem in family educational practice. In China, parents care about doing the most of the things for their child. It includes the intrinsic reason: the burden of education system in China. It is ridiculous that this kind of college depends on the students’ score and the students inevitably pursuit the score. The values between the two countries are different, so are living styles and social systems. As for concept, historical background, culture and education, there are lots of quite differences. The Chinese focus on studying scores and the master skills. No matter what they learn, they try to do the best; no matter what they do, they strive for perfection. In brief, Chinese try to make children feel the social being, create the environment to make children learn to grow up. Chinese children are passive, malleable, and growing up under the guidance of their parents.
In comparison with the vision that Chinese students and parents are focusing on the children entering higher schools step by step, American lay emphasis on training students’ abilities. They pay attention to the children''s sense of social participation. There are many chances for children to choose freely. The teacher still does his utmost to encourage children to play freely, to be creative, and in order to train children''s imaginations and creativities. Americans train the child for the real world. American children are initiative and rich in creating. The self-actualization is the children''s own nature and development; the adult only needs to offer the favorable condition. Certainly, the American education also has the malpractice. It is too free and too interesting in individual development. The worst is the lack of controlling the morality.
目录：
Abstract…………………..………………………………………………..………I
Key Words……………………………………………………………………………I
摘要……………………………………….…………………………………..……II
关键词………………………………………………………………………………II
Introduction…………………………………………………………………….……1
I. The Comparsion of Two Countries Family Education…………….…..…………2
A. The Comparison of Education Purpose ….…………………………………2
B. The Comparison of Education Method ….…………………………………..3 C. The Comparison of Education Result….………………………………..……4
II. Analyzing Reasons for Different Family Education Modal between China and
America……………………………………………………………………………5
A. The Difference of the Historical Background …………………….…..………5
B. The Difference of the Economic Shape ….…………………………………..5
C. The Difference of Social Conditions ……………………………….…………6
D. The Difference of Cultural Traditions …………………………….…………7
III. Measures to Improve Individual Ability ……………………….……………9
A. Changing Suitable Educational Concept…………….…………………….9
B. Understanding Definite Educational Purpose……..………………..……10
C. Adopting Suitable Educational Ways ……..………………..…………11
Conclusion……………………………………………………………….……….…..13
Acknowledgements…………………………………………….………………..…..14
Bibliography……………………………………………………………….……….15
参考文献：
Elizabeth. Valley Selei. American parents how to "control" their children.Beijing: International Culture press,2004.
George Watson.Writing a Thesis : a Guide to Long Essays and Dissertations.Chengdu :Sichuan University press,2003.
Mlke.Silitum.Flea Readers. Beijing :Foreign language press,2000.
P.G.Beidler.Writing Matters. Chengdu :Sichuan University press,2003.
Wang Qiang.A Cause in English Language Teaching. Senior education press,2000.
Thomas. Likena. American family education. Haikou: Hainan press,2005.
陈建翔.他们影响了全世界家庭 [M]. 北京 ：北京出版社 ， 2005.
陈新峰.培养优秀孩子的8个锦囊[M]. 北京：石油工业出版社，2005.
房阳洋，关阿津，汤海清.观念决定成长[M]. 北京：团结出版社，2005.
高芸香.我的家庭课堂[M]. 北京：中国人民大学出版社，2004.
胡东芳.教育新思维[M]. 桂林：广西师范大学出版社， 2003.
胡东芳.让教育焕发生命的价值[M]. 桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2003.
贾黛羽.世界最伟大的教育法规[M].上海：文汇出版社，2003.
李安.美式教育成功之密[M]. 呼和浩特：内蒙古人民出版社， 2001.
[15]刘平.打包中国教育[M]. 北京：时事出版社，2005.
[16]吴垒.走出家庭教育的误区[M]. 成都：四川科学技术出版社，2003.
[17]扬晓升.拷问中国教育[M]. 上海：文汇出版社，2005.
[18]佚名. 国外的父母如何教孩子自立,美国家庭教育见闻,中西方教育差异之家庭教育[J].
[19]佚名. 家庭教育中的问题及对策[J].
作者点评：
中美家庭教育与个人能力培养
Everyone knows that family is the first teacher to train the individual ability, in a sense, talents'' competition is a competition of parents educating children ability. So, the countries all over the world pay more attention to family education in training talents'' education project in new century. Now the family education has already caused the concern from various circles of society in China, there are still some mistaken ideas remained in the education of many Chinese families. It even becomes a kind of persistent ailment, and influences the forming of a generation with good quality. Therefore, it is necessary to draw lessons from the valuable practices in the family education of other countries. It will have good inspiration and alarm function in stepping the mistaken idea educated in China.
The purpose of American family education is fostering independent children who can adapt to each environment. The purpose of Chinese is training children to be talent. About education concept, American parents think children are independent, they have their willing and personality, do not belong to their parents. Parents or teachers have no right to dominate or restrict children’s behavior. Chinese parents think children are one part of their lives; they should protect children, offer good living situation and plan their futures. On education method, American parents adopt democracy attitude. They give children power to do anything. Chinese parents interfere and worry excessively; they control children’s lives. This essay attempts to compare family education differences between China and the United States, and find advantages of American family education which can offer reference for Chinese. It can change Chinese children into independent ones who can adapt to each environment and have the ability to solve complex problem by themselves.