摘 要：随着法治发展和诉讼高潮的到来，民事诉讼审前程序成了当前审判方式改革的一个热门话题,因为它的合理与否直接影响着民事审判的公正与效率。重新审视构建审前准备程序有利于案件集中审理，提高效益，保障公平、公正，实现正义。本文首先对审前程序的基本原理进行概述，然后对比两大法系的优劣，接着分分析我国目前在立法和司法实践的众多弊端和症结，最后借鉴吸收西方国家的经验和成功做法，结合我国的现有国情研究得出改革中坚持的原则和相关的制度构建和改革完善的措施，以期早日建成程意义上的审前程序。
关键词：民事诉讼 审前程序 正义效率 制度构建
Abstract
With the development of the rule of law and the upsurge of the litigation, the pre-trial procedures for civil trial is becoming a hot topic in the current reform of the trial mode, because the construction of the proceedings is reasonable or not which directly affect the justice and efficiency on the trial of civil. re-positioning the function of the pre-trial preparation program features which will has a positive significance to deepen the judicial reform and improves the Civil litigation Law , protects the fairness ,realizes the justice value target. This article outlines the basic principles of principles of the pre-trial procedures and contrasts the two law systems. Then it analyzes the drawbacks in the current legislation and judicial practice. In the end it absorbs the experience of Western countries and successful practices of the current situation in the reform, studies the principles and relevant constructional steps, and improves the measures of system .in the end the author want to construct the real pre-trial procedures.
Key words: civil procedure, pre-trail procedures, justice, Construction of the system
前言
民事审前程序是整个民事诉讼程序的重要组成部分，也是民事诉讼改革的重要内容，同样是建设以庭审为中心的现代化民事诉讼程序结构的重要基础。在我国较长的一段时间里，理论和实务界普遍存在着重实体轻程序的倾向，从而直接影响着民事审判的公正和效率。在新的司法理论的影响之下，世界各国日益重视对审前程序的改革和完善，两大法系的民事诉讼活动从原来偏重开庭审理转向审前准备与开庭审理并重，且日益相互借鉴、趋利避害，呈趋同的特征。本文通过对两大法系民事审前程序的比较研究，从我国民事审前程序在立法滞后性和司法实践中的问题入手，分析其中之弊端不症结，并对其完善提出解决办法，通过系统化的研究，以期对今后我国审前准备程序的构建有所裨益，实现效益和公正的价值目标。
