摘要：随着新课程改革的深入发展，语文的教学实践也遭遇到前所未有的压力。《语文课程标准》是指导语文教学实践的纲领性、法规性文件，是语文教学实践必须遵循的准则。它的科学与否，关系到我们的语文教育是否能够尽快地走出困境。所以本论文拟采用文献考察和理论分析相结合的方式，在充分了解语文教育改革历史演变和现状的基础上，以《语文课程标准》为切入点，探讨分析其对语文教育发展的作用，进而尝试提出相应的对策和建议。
要正确理解这次的语文新课改，必须深入了解指导这次新课改的新的教育理念和课程观，以及我国语文教育在历史上发展的状况和它在国际国内所处的位置，才能站在更宽阔的视角上来审视这次语文新课程改革的得失和成败。
1905年9月，满清政府宣布停科举，兴学堂，开始了长路漫漫的“西方学步之旅”。但是还仅仅表现出由介绍、翻译转向评述而已，即便是有少许实践研究也离形成我们真正自己的教育思想体系还有相当大的距离。而西方与此同时则进行了三次大规模的教育改革。
现代语文教育自1904年清政府“癸卯学制”规定语文单独设科，至今已有100多年了，但现状仍不尽如人意，盲目性、功利性仍是当前语文教学中普遍存在的问题。为什么表面热闹、花样翻新的语文教育一直难以走出低谷呢？这不仅让我们怀疑“汉语发展”的合理性。也许我们无法否认，自上个世纪以来，由于众所周知的原因，汉语一直处在被压抑和被控制的窘境之中，它的精神和思想不可避免地受到西方意识形态的浸润，而自身的文化传统却面对着越来越严重的危机局面。
这次语文课程标准改革，一改以往历次教学大纲只是在行为表述上的修改，从语文学科的性质和地位、基本理念、课程目标、教学评价等原则性问题上提出了崭新的论断，是真正意义上关于语文教学的革命。首先它提出了以建构主义作为新课程标准的核心理念；其次，“人文性”的提出提升了语文学科的内涵；第三，它注重语文的实践性表明了语文知识传授重点的转变；第四，“语文素养”的提出标志着语文学科的目的理念发生了质的飞跃；第五，语文教材也完成了教本到读本的转变。
作为新课程改革的纲领性文件，《语文课程标准》较以前的教学大纲在理论上无疑具有新的突破。然而，它也并非没有值得完善和改进的地方，在当前课改进程中，我们不难发现它还存在着不少问题，亟需我们去探索，去研究。所以，《语文课程标准》必须从教育实践的基础上加以完善，才有可能使这次新课改真正地走下去。
关键词：语文 课程标准 改革 理念 反思
Abstract：The thorough development reforms which along with the new curriculum, the Chinese teaching practice also encounters to the unprecedented pressure. "Chinese Curriculum Standard" is instructs the Chinese teaching practice the programmatic quality, the laws and regulations document, is criterion which the Chinese teaching practice must follow. Its science or not, relates our language to educate whether can go out the difficult position as soon as possible. Therefore the present paper plans the way which uses the literature inspection and the theoretical analysis unifies, in the full understanding Chinese education reform history evolution and in the present situation foundation, as cuts into the spot take "Chinese Curriculum Standard", the discussion analyzes it to the Chinese education development function, then the attempt proposes the corresponding countermeasure and the suggestion.
Must correctly understand this language New class changes, must thoroughly understand instructs new education idea and curriculum view which this new class changes, as well as our country language education the condition which develops in the history and it in the position which international domestic locates, can stand in a broader angle of view carefully examines the success and failure and the success or failure which this language New curriculum reforms.
In September, 1905, the Qing government announced stops the imperial civil service examination, is popular the school, started the long road endless "a west study step of travel". But also merely displays by the introduction, the translation changes the narration, even if has the little practice research also to leave forms we true own education ideology also to have the quite great distance. But the west has at the same time carried on three large-scale educations reforms.
Modern Chinese education from 1904 Qing government "Kui Mao educational system" stipulation Chinese alone Establishes the Subject, until now already some more than 100 years, but present situation still not entirely as desired, blindness, the utility still was in the current Chinese teaching the universal existence question. Is the surface why lively Chinese education which disguises the old as the new to go out the trough continuously with difficulty? This not only lets we suspects "Chinese development" the rationality. Perhaps we are unable to deny, since an on century, as a result of the well known reason, Chinese continuously has occupied is constrained with in the predicament which controls, its spirit and the thought inevitably receive the west ideology infiltrating, but own cultural tradition actually is facing the more and more serious crisis aspect.
This Chinese curriculum standard reform, as soon as changed formerly successively the program of instruction only was indicates on in the behavior the revision, from Chinese discipline nature and status, basic idea, curriculum goal, teaching appraisal and so on principled in the question proposed the brand-new judgment, was in the true significance about Chinese teaching revolution. First it proposed constructs the construction principle to take the new curriculum standard the core idea; Next, "humanities" proposed has promoted Chinese discipline connotation; Third, it paid great attention to Chinese the practicality to indicate the Chinese knowledge instruction key transformation; Fourth, "Chinese accomplishment" proposed symbolized Chinese discipline goal idea has had the quantities leap; Fifth, Chinese teaching material has also completed teach book to the textbook transformation.
Platform reforms which as the new curriculum, "Chinese Curriculum Standard" compared before the program of instruction in theoretically had the new breakthrough without doubt. However, it by no means has not also been worth consummating and the improvement place, reforms in the advancement in the current curriculum, we are not difficult to discover it also has many problems, urgently needs us to explore, studies. Therefore, "Chinese Curriculum Standard" must perform from in the education practice foundation to consummate, only then has the possibility to cause this new curriculum to reform truly goes down.
Keyword： Chinese，course criterion，reformation，idea，rethink profoundly
前 言
2005年10月17日19时06分，最后一个现代文学巨匠巴金永远离开了我们。老人的逝去，不只是一个文学家的离开，而是一个时代的终结。
自此，世间再无大师……
老人的死早没有悬念，他那古树一样麻木的身体根本无法得知沧桑世事，他灵魂的弥留只是为了链接我们和上一个世纪文学生活的某种血脉，或者是强撑着对我们进行有限的安慰；但当这样的死亡发生时仍然像一次雷击，断然割裂我们与20世纪经典写作方式的最后一丝关系，大师已死，最后一个大师已死！
我们生活在一个没有大师的时代，文字荒原的沉闷透出死亡的窒息。我不禁想起了160多年前,诗人龚自珍痛感于“万马齐喑究可哀”的现状，而发出“我劝天公重抖擞，不拘一格降人才”的呼喊。然而“天公”终究没有盼到，“人才”只能靠我们自己来教育。于是在二十世纪初，“语文改革运动”顺理成章地拉开了它那漫长的序幕。但事情的结果并不总像善良的人们所期待的那样，在百年轰轰烈烈的改革中，先驱们一次次的努力最终总是被无情的现实所击碎。而两次“观念革命”——“五四新文化运动”和“无产阶级文化大革命”，还导致了历史传统、经典文化、区域文化和弱势民族文化的崩溃 ，从而引发了更大的灾难性后果。
